Skip to main content

Perspective of an anonymous Japanese gamer

  First of all, most Japanese people don't give a crap about political correctness. It doesn't mean we have no interest in it. Of course we want the world to be a better place. No war, no racism and no sexual harassments, that is a good thing. So we think political correctness isn't a bad thing.

 However, we don't really need to be concerned about that even in games or other entertainments, do we? Do you think for yourselves while gaming, "hey there is a Asian man in this game, that is a good point because that's diverse"? No. We want a good game with a good story, good animations, good music, good dialogues and good characters. Not the diversity. I know the diversity in characters makes a good story. Unique and diverse characters will definitely make the story interesting, but the what's wrong is that the PC people are criticizing in lack of diversity, not the game itself. Maybe there is a game which is set in Europe which all the characters in the game is white and no black people, but that is right, that is the setting. There is nothing bad about it. 

Us human has an ability to separate real life from fiction. We don't care if its politically correct or not because that is a fiction. Also, it is only racist if its made of racist purpose. We just want to play good games, watch good films and read good books. 

Comments

  1. Dear Hiroaki,

    I just read an article today that is not directly about political correctness but I thought it had relevance to the topic.

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/poll-the-real-reason-republicans-are-so-riled-up-about-critical-race-theory-090015052.html

    It’s an article about how some conservative groups in the States oppose the teaching of Critical Race Theory in schools. The interesting thing is that if the people who say they oppose the the teaching of CRT are asked instead whether they agree or disagree with the concept that “racism is not merely the product of individual bias or prejudice, but also something embedded in legal systems and policies,” they tend to agree with that statement. This gets at the problem of the label not being the same thing, necessarily, of what that label is supposed to represent.

    This is much like how someone might answer “Yeah, games should just be about fun” if they are asked the leading question “Do you think it’s PC to be concerned about having more LBGTQ+ individuals as characters in games?” But, if you asked “Would you like to see more characters in games who you can relate to and who make you feel like you belong,” most people would think there’s nothing at all PC about that. The label can mask the gist of the issue. Just something to think about.

    Cheers,
    Joseph D.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You need to cite a source or sources even for your perspectives, even if it's largely a composite of various sources. By using the citation generator at https://www.scribbr.com/apa-citation-generator/ it's possible to even cite YouTube videos or Internet forums as sources. Creative works, such as films or games can also be cited.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why is PC being criticized?/What is "Social Justice Warrior" aka "SJW"?/ Why is "SJW" being criticized?/Is certain people becoming too aggressive trying to push and conform people to their ideology?

 Social Justice Warriors, aka SJWs, use political correctness as a weapon to criticize what they think is "politically incorrect". Social justice warrior (SJW) is a term used for an individual who promotes socially progressive and liberal views, including feminism, civil rights, gay and transgender rights. Most of the time, saying somebody is a SJW means that they are pursuing his/her personal validation rather than the actual "liberal" way of thinking.  So basically, it is not the political correctness itself that are being criticized but the SWJs, people who are using it as a weapon are instead. Boghossian, P., & Lindsay, J. (2019, October 12). Social-Justice Warriors Won’t Listen, but You Should. WSJ. https://www.wsj.com/articles/social-justice-warriors-wont-listen-but-you-should-11570832255

Is being equal a good thing?/Is being different a good thing?

  As I said, diversity is important. It will make your perspectives and life experience richer, less discrimination in the world and many more benefits.  However, us humans liked discrimination. That is because of our instinct, we needed make that decision in order to live back in the old days. The nature of discrimination has been with us until now, and that is why bullying and racism occurs.   All of us know that discrimination isn't a good thing. Being equal to all kinds of people is important, but doing that too much is different. Dragging somebody down from a position of power to make it "equal" is too extreme.   As I said, being too radical and extreme is not "correct". See it from the both perspectives and then think how we can solve the problem.

Which is important; quality or diversity?/Is being historically accurate offensive to some people?/Is putting race and sexism into every discussion, media and art is "politically correct"?

  In my personal opinion, both of them are very important. Recently, the video game industry has become more diverse than ever. Not only the women's social progress, people from all over the country has been supporting video game industry.   Games that has many characters such as Apex Legends and Overwatch, all of them are from different country, has different sex, religions and it is very diverse. Of course the diversity in gaming is a good thing, but not everything is good.  A good example is Witcher 3 incident. The game was criticized because all the character in the game was white. However, the Witcher 3 is set in Poland, created by Polish man and it is based on Polish mythology and European Folklore. So criticizing that there is no Black or Asian character in Witcher is an mistake because that is the culture and the demographic in the game. You don't have to put colored skinned character in the game if it doesn't make sense. Putting race and sexism into eve...