Skip to main content

30 Research Questions

30 Research Questions


※PC = Political Correctness

  1. What is the meaning of PC?
  2. When did the meaning of PC changed?
  3. Is PC a discrimination?
  4. Are there any connections between PC and feminism or other controversial issues?
  5. Is the spread of internet related to this issue?
  6. Why is PC being criticized?
  7. Why are some people thinks being "politically correct" is a good thing to do?
  8. Why are some people against PC?
  9. Any examples of people who are for PC?
  10. Any examples of people who are against PC?
  11. What are the effects of PC?
  12. What are the benefits from being "politically correct"?
  13. Is being "politically correct" ruining something?
  14. Is being "politically correct" taking away freedom from people?
  15. Should we ban things if it weren't "politically correct?"
  16. Are people who are for PC being too radical?
  17. Are people who are against PC being too radical?
  18. Are people who are for PC using PC as a tool to criticize what they didn't like?
  19. On the other hand, are people who are against PC using PC as a tool to criticize what they didn't like?
  20. What is "Social Justice Warrior" aka "SJW"?
  21. Why is "SJW" being criticized?
  22. What is "Gamergate"?
  23. Which is important; quality or diversity?
  24. Is being historically accurate offensive to some people?
  25. Is putting race and sexism into every discussion, media and art is "politically correct"?
  26. Is certain people becoming too aggressive trying to push and conform people to their ideology?
  27. Is being equal a good thing?
  28. Is being different a good thing?
  29. Isn't it impossible to make a world fully "politically corrected"? 
  30. Last question, how should we deal with PC?

Comments

  1. jodiasJuly 2, 2021 at 6:49 AM

    When you refer to being for or against political correctness in your research questions it's unclear whether you mean for or against the labeling of things as politically correct, or for or against things believed to be "politically correct."

    Also, your second question is "When did the meaning of PC change?" This assumes that it has changed? So, a more fundamental question might be "Has the meaning of PC changed and, if so, how did it change and when did that change take place?

    Your question "Which is more important, quality or diversity?" has the underlying assumption that one is more important than the other. Both can be important without necessarily being on a gradient of importance.

    Question 25 seems to suggest that race and gender is put into every discussion of art or media. You'll need to be careful when answering questions like this not to "cherry pick" the examples that back it up.

    Question 29 is interesting but the question is "from whose perspective"?



    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why is PC being criticized?/What is "Social Justice Warrior" aka "SJW"?/ Why is "SJW" being criticized?/Is certain people becoming too aggressive trying to push and conform people to their ideology?

 Social Justice Warriors, aka SJWs, use political correctness as a weapon to criticize what they think is "politically incorrect". Social justice warrior (SJW) is a term used for an individual who promotes socially progressive and liberal views, including feminism, civil rights, gay and transgender rights. Most of the time, saying somebody is a SJW means that they are pursuing his/her personal validation rather than the actual "liberal" way of thinking.  So basically, it is not the political correctness itself that are being criticized but the SWJs, people who are using it as a weapon are instead. Boghossian, P., & Lindsay, J. (2019, October 12). Social-Justice Warriors Won’t Listen, but You Should. WSJ. https://www.wsj.com/articles/social-justice-warriors-wont-listen-but-you-should-11570832255
Post a Comment
Read more

Is being equal a good thing?/Is being different a good thing?

  As I said, diversity is important. It will make your perspectives and life experience richer, less discrimination in the world and many more benefits.  However, us humans liked discrimination. That is because of our instinct, we needed make that decision in order to live back in the old days. The nature of discrimination has been with us until now, and that is why bullying and racism occurs.   All of us know that discrimination isn't a good thing. Being equal to all kinds of people is important, but doing that too much is different. Dragging somebody down from a position of power to make it "equal" is too extreme.   As I said, being too radical and extreme is not "correct". See it from the both perspectives and then think how we can solve the problem.
Post a Comment
Read more

Which is important; quality or diversity?/Is being historically accurate offensive to some people?/Is putting race and sexism into every discussion, media and art is "politically correct"?

  In my personal opinion, both of them are very important. Recently, the video game industry has become more diverse than ever. Not only the women's social progress, people from all over the country has been supporting video game industry.   Games that has many characters such as Apex Legends and Overwatch, all of them are from different country, has different sex, religions and it is very diverse. Of course the diversity in gaming is a good thing, but not everything is good.  A good example is Witcher 3 incident. The game was criticized because all the character in the game was white. However, the Witcher 3 is set in Poland, created by Polish man and it is based on Polish mythology and European Folklore. So criticizing that there is no Black or Asian character in Witcher is an mistake because that is the culture and the demographic in the game. You don't have to put colored skinned character in the game if it doesn't make sense. Putting race and sexism into eve...
Post a Comment
Read more